Artificial intelligence is the story of this decade. The models are growing, the chips are in short supply, and the infrastructure spend is mind-boggling.
But behind the headlines about ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini lies a quieter revolution — how the AI boom is being financed.
This isn’t your typical venture capital story. Today, some of the biggest players in AI are not just customers or partners — they’re shareholders in each other.
In this article, we see who’s investing in whom, why it matters, and what lessons history offers from another era of cross-company investing: 1980s Japan.
🧩 What’s Really Happening
The AI gold rush has two sides: building the technology and paying for it.
The build-out is capital-hungry — vast data centres, power-hungry GPUs, new cooling systems, and ever-expanding networks. So, instead of relying solely on outside investors, the tech giants are increasingly financing each other’s growth.
Think of it as a circular economy for capital:
- Cloud providers invest in AI model companies that will use their infrastructure.
- Chipmakers take stakes in data centre operators that buy their hardware.
- AI model firms sign multi-year contracts — and sometimes buy shares — in the companies supplying their compute power.
- Private equity and sovereign funds step in to co-finance the infrastructure backbone.
It’s all interconnected. The cash flows one way, and the equity ownership often flows right back.
🔄 Cross-Holdings: Who’s Investing in Whom
A few years ago, tech companies tried to avoid conflicts of interest. Now, many of them are locking in strategic alliances through ownership.
Some clear examples:
- Nvidia → OpenAI
Nvidia has reportedly agreed to invest up to $100 billion in OpenAI — part capital, part supply commitment. Nvidia provides the chips, OpenAI guarantees demand.
Both sides win — for now. - BlackRock / Nvidia / Microsoft → Aligned Data Centers
This consortium agreed to buy Aligned Data Centers for $40 billion, creating a giant AI-focused data-centre operator.
The deal combines equity ownership with long-term leasing contracts — effectively turning AI infrastructure into a shared utility. - CoreWeave and OpenAI
CoreWeave, which provides GPU-based cloud services, borrowed billions using its servers as collateral — and sold a stake to OpenAI, one of its biggest customers. - SoftBank and Arm
SoftBank plans to borrow around $5 billion against its Arm shares to plough even more money into AI. - ASML and Mistral AI
Dutch chip-equipment maker ASML now owns roughly 11% of French startup Mistral AI — aligning chip development with next-generation model training.
It’s an intricate web of ownership. AI firms, chipmakers, data-centre operators and financiers are all feeding each other’s growth.
⚖️ Why Companies Do It
The motivation is simple: speed and control.
Advantages:
- Strategic alignment – You invest in the suppliers or customers you rely on most.
- Faster decisions – You don’t wait for external investors or IPOs to fund expansion.
- Synergies – Data, hardware, and software roadmaps stay in sync.
- Option value – Even small stakes can turn into billion-dollar wins if the partner succeeds.
But this approach isn’t risk-free.
Disadvantages:
- Conflicts of interest – Are you a customer or a shareholder first?
- Opaque valuations – When companies own each other, who decides what’s really worth what?
- Leverage risk – Borrowing against shares or GPUs can backfire fast if prices fall.
- Capital misallocation – Some deals may be driven more by strategy than by sound economics.
- Network fragility – If one link in the chain falters, others can feel the strain.
This kind of financial ecosystem is powerful in a boom — but can amplify pain in a downturn.
🏯 Lessons from Japan’s 1980s Cross-Shareholding Era
If this feels familiar, it should. Japan’s corporate world in the 1970s–80s was built on cross-shareholdings — a web of mutual stakes between companies, banks, and suppliers known as the keiretsu.
At first, it worked brilliantly:
- Companies were insulated from takeovers.
- Stock prices were stable.
- Long-term relationships fostered industrial strength.
But over time, the system showed cracks:
- Profits were recycled within networks rather than reinvested productively.
- Governance weakened as no one wanted to challenge a “partner.”
- When the 1990s recession hit, valuations collapsed and the web of inter-ownership magnified the pain.
Japan eventually had to unwind much of that structure. It took a decade to clean up.
The parallel isn’t perfect — today’s AI firms are global, not domestic — but the principle holds: cross-ownership stabilises in good times and constrains in bad.
🔍 What to Watch Next
As AI enters its “infrastructure age,” investors should keep an eye on five red flags:
- Transparency – Are cross-holdings clearly reported and valued?
- Debt levels – How much of the AI build-out is being financed with borrowed money?
- Interdependence risk – Could one company’s stumble cascade through the system?
- Regulation – Are antitrust authorities comfortable with these alliances?
- Exit plans – Will firms actually sell down their stakes, or will capital stay trapped?
The lesson from history: financial ecosystems that look self-sustaining may hide hidden secrets.
💡 Final Thought
AI is no longer a startup story — it’s a capital story.
The world’s biggest tech companies are acting as venture investors, infrastructure financiers, and ecosystem builders all at once.
It’s brilliant strategy and bold risk-taking rolled together.
But if the AI boom ever slows, we may find that the financial plumbing underneath it is more interconnected — and more fragile — than it looks.
Clearly Investments Blog — helping investors understand how innovation, markets, and money work.
0 Comments